Chinese People's Arbitration: How Ordinary People Resolve Disputes

Contents:

• People's arbitration: what it is and how it functions
• The origin and development of the people's arbitration system in China
• How people's arbitration harmonizes with Chinese culture

Public Arbitration: What It Is and How It Functions

Many people face problems with the quality of services in the food delivery industry. The author of this article experienced a situation where, after ordering Japanese rolls, he received boiled potatoes instead of the expected red fish. Contacting customer support was unsuccessful, as the staff showed indifference and took no action. This led to dissatisfaction and a desire to resolve the situation. Food delivery quality must meet high standards, and such misunderstandings undermine trust in the service. In China, the situation is significantly different. In recent years, many online trading platforms have implemented public arbitration mechanisms, where conflicts between customers and sellers are resolved by an independent jury of user volunteers, rather than by customer support. This approach facilitates faster and more efficient dispute resolution, ensuring fair conflict resolution and increasing trust in the platforms. This innovation has become an important step in the development of e-commerce in China, allowing users to feel protected and confident in their purchases.

In the article by Jennifer Conrad An interesting case is described illustrating the approach to dispute resolution in the food delivery industry. A customer who ordered garlic oysters through the Meituan app was dissatisfied with the amount of garlic in his dish. He decided to file a complaint with a dedicated dispute resolution service, where his case was reviewed by a group of volunteers known as the "kangaroo jury." After carefully analyzing the photos provided, the majority of the jury voted to refund the customer. This case highlights the importance of transparency and customer service in the delivery industry, as well as the role of public opinion in conflict resolution.

People's arbitration provides an opportunity to resolve minor disputes that typically do not reach formal court proceedings. This could concern, for example, discrepancies in the quantity of ingredients in a dish or improper charges in online stores. In 2021, the Meituan platform recorded approximately 500-700 such cases daily, underscoring the relevance and effectiveness of people's arbitration in resolving conflicts between consumers and service providers. This approach allows for quick and cost-effective solutions, making it attractive to users seeking justice and protection of their rights.

Consumers aren't always right in their assessments. For example, one Meituan user left a negative review of a cafe because the waiter asked him not to throw away the food. As a result, the cafe filed a complaint, and the review was deleted. This case highlights that the review system doesn't always ensure objectivity and can be influenced by circumstances.

Taobao, a C2C marketplace owned by Alibaba, pioneered popular arbitration. In 2012, Taobao introduced a dispute resolution model in which 31 volunteer users resolved conflicts between buyers and sellers. Participants could select cases of interest to them and review up to 20 disputes per day, making the process more interactive and efficient. This initiative significantly improved interaction between platform users, increasing trust in the service and facilitating faster dispute resolution. People's arbitration on Taobao was an important step in the evolution of online commerce, demonstrating how communities can self-manage dispute resolution processes. By 2014, Taobao was processing up to two thousand disputes daily. While people's arbitration is no longer used on Taobao, it continues to operate successfully on Alibaba's Xianyu platform, where it resolves up to 95% of all disputes. The effectiveness of people's arbitration on Xianyu demonstrates the high level of user trust in this dispute resolution mechanism. People's arbitration covers not only purchases but also copyright protection in the digital space. In 2018, WeChat implemented an article review system to combat rewriting. This system allows authors to file plagiarism complaints. If 70% of experts confirm that an article is a copy, it is replaced with the original work. This initiative significantly promotes copyright protection and supports the integrity of content.

The Origin and Development of the People's Arbitration System in China

Since the advent of online commerce in China over a decade ago, a significant problem has arisen with the lack of systems for assessing the health of businesses. Rating agencies and consumer protection organizations were virtually nonexistent. Initially, the government and companies delegated responsibility for fraud prevention to third-party contractors, somewhat reminiscent of practices in the West, where users of platforms such as eBay and Amazon can dispute transactions through credit card issuers. This created gaps in consumer protection and complicated the process of ensuring trust in e-commerce. Over time, new mechanisms and technologies aimed at solving these problems began to emerge in China, which contributed to the formation of a more robust ecosystem for online commerce.

The existing system didn't ensure fairness and didn't take user interests into account. Therefore, companies like Alibaba and Tencent began developing their own mechanisms for resolving disputes.

They created efficient systems for processing digital payments and actively implemented crowdsourced volunteer justice, which marked a significant breakthrough in arbitration. These innovations not only improve the speed and security of transactions but also open up new opportunities for citizen participation in legal proceedings. Crowdsourced justice helps distribute the burden on the judicial system, improving access to justice for all.

This approach proved simpler and more cost-effective than developing complex professional arbitration mechanisms or expanding the functions of the customer service department. The presence of such institutions significantly increases consumer trust in the platform, as users who actively engage with the system exhibit less bias. This creates a more transparent and reliable environment for interaction, which in turn attracts new customers and promotes retention of existing ones.

In the early 2010s, the American company eBay experimented with people's arbitration in India, but the experience was unsuccessful. Digital trade arbitration expert Colin Rowe notes that eBay representatives shared their experience at a business conference in Hong Kong. These ideas attracted the attention of specialists from Alibaba, which ultimately contributed to the development of people's arbitration in China. Thus, despite eBay's failure in India, their ideas have influenced the Chinese market and become the basis for new approaches in digital commerce.

How People's Arbitration Harmonizes with Chinese Culture

People's arbitration in China, inspired by the eBay model, fits harmoniously into the country's cultural and social traditions. This phenomenon not only demonstrates the unique aspects of Chinese society but also has the ability to adapt to its peculiarities. People's arbitration is becoming an important tool for dispute resolution, allowing users to effectively find compromises and fairly resolve conflicts. This helps build trust between participants in trading processes and improves the overall atmosphere in the e-commerce sector in China.

The Chinese political system, despite its authoritarian nature, provides opportunities for a certain degree of freedom in local communities. This balance between control and civic initiative was established during the Chinese Revolution (1911-1949), which became the basis for the formation of modern mechanisms of interaction between the state and citizens. As a result, initiatives aimed at improving the lives of local residents are emerging in various regions of the country, demonstrating a desire for a degree of autonomy within the overall system. This approach allows the government to adapt to local conditions and demands, creating a unique dynamic in governance and interaction with the population.

After the Bolsheviks came to power in Russia and effectively declared war on the peasantry, the Chinese communists, inspired by their ideas, chose an alternative path. For over thirty years, they waged a guerrilla war, actively winning the support of the peasants. This strategy allowed them to build a solid base and ultimately ensure victory in the civil war. Their success was the result of an understanding of the needs and interests of the peasantry, which played a key role in their political strategy.

The Red Army of China played an important role in supporting the peasants, rebuilding destroyed homes and introducing modern agricultural methods. The Communist Party sought to create the appearance of peasant participation in decision-making, which contributed to their economic development and improved living conditions. This approach strengthened ties between the peasant population and the authorities, which in turn had a positive impact on the country's socioeconomic situation.

After the revolution, the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) commitment to cooperation with the peasantry remained stable. As noted sociologist Theda Skocpol points out, since the 1960s, the key organizational unit in agriculture has been the "brigade," managed by an elected local leader. This structure enjoyed significant autonomy, enabling local decision-making. This approach facilitated a more effective integration of peasant interests and state policy, which in turn influenced the development of China's agricultural sector.

In the 1990s, the country liberalized its system, allowing farmers to sell their produce at market prices. This marked a significant milestone in the development of agriculture and economic freedom. However, in the 1980s, mass protests aimed at democratization were brutally suppressed. This forced the authorities to reconsider their approaches to governance and address popular demands. Liberalization responded to the challenges of the times and contributed to a shift in economic policy, which subsequently influenced the development of the agricultural sector.

In response to public demand for greater control over government, the Communist Party of China (CPC) introduced elements of deliberative democracy. This innovation allows citizens to actively participate in the discussion of local issues through juries made up of ordinary people. This initiative creates a platform for constructive dialogue between residents and government officials. Such interaction promotes more open governance and increased government transparency, which in turn can strengthen public trust in government institutions.

Modern models of rational communication, developed by leading scholars including James Fishkin, play a key role in new approaches to organizing debate. These models promote equal opportunities for all participants, providing an open platform for the expression of opinions. The implementation of these approaches helps create a more inclusive and productive atmosphere for debate, which facilitates a deeper understanding of diverse perspectives.

Discussions within the party system are controlled, but citizens are able to freely express their opinions and defend their interests. Australian scholar He Baogang notes that this structure promotes active participation by people in addressing pressing issues, which, in turn, increases government accountability. This interaction between citizens and authorities facilitates more effective resolution of social and political issues, strengthening democratic processes and ensuring that the interests of all segments of the population are taken into account.

Popular arbitration on trading platforms serves a function similar to local juries and teams. While participation in these institutions does not provide complete freedom in the classical sense, it does give citizens the opportunity to actively participate in the process of achieving justice. In a modern society where interaction and cooperation are key, the importance of such participation is increasing. People's arbitration promotes more transparent and effective dispute resolution, making it an important tool for maintaining social justice on trading platforms.

Reworked text for SEO:

Also study:

• How Chinese EdTech companies adapt to new restrictions: reports for 2023
• Startup closures: what happened in 2022?
• Careless words: how statements by businessmen affect company stocks
• Technological singularity: changes in laws and business