How history lessons were removed from Soviet schools for 14 years

The question of what should take up more space in the school curriculum - the history of the development of society or knowledge of its modern structure - remains relevant. It's important to understand that history helps us understand how the social structures and values that shape our society today were formed. However, a hundred years ago, these issues were handled differently. Between 1920 and 1934, history was excluded from the Soviet school curriculum, leaving an entire generation without an understanding of historical context. This decision had a significant impact on the views and knowledge of people at that time. It's important to remember that knowledge of history fosters critical thinking and helps us avoid the mistakes of the past. Modern educational standards require a balanced combination of history and modernity to prepare students for life in a complex and changing world.

Why History Disappeared

After the Revolution, the Bolsheviks initiated a rapid transition to a new society—communist, secular, and international. The leaders of the October Revolution viewed education as a tool for shaping a new Soviet man, capable of inspiring revolution worldwide and liberating the proletariat from oppression. This new man was not simply to understand history, but to actively create it. It's no surprise that in the young Soviet Union, the old historical science was deemed obsolete and unnecessary. It recounted the deeds of the tsars and representatives of the exploiting classes, which, according to Soviet leaders, could lead to an anti-Marxist perception of the past. "Correct" history, according to their views, was to be based on facts selected in accordance with Marxist methodology. One of the main proponents of this idea, Mikhail Pokrovsky, served as Deputy People's Commissar for Education from May 1918. A historian with a classical university education received in the 1880s, he believed that everything "superfluous" that did not illustrate the class struggle should be excluded. For example, for Pokrovsky, ancient history was merely unverifiable tales, devoid of scientific value. This approach to historical knowledge had a significant influence on the formation of Soviet historiography and the country's educational system.

Anatoly Lunacharsky, the People's Commissar for Education, expressed a radical view on the role of history in education in a 1918 speech. He argued that history should not be taught at all in a properly organized school. Lunacharsky justified his position by arguing that the study of history makes people dependent on a corrupt past and fosters chauvinistic attitudes. He criticized the memorization of historical dates and events, calling it "dead history," and compared it to the study of dead languages such as Latin and Ancient Greek, which, in his view, offer no practical benefit. Lunacharsky emphasized the need to rethink approaches to education, emphasizing relevant knowledge and skills that could prepare individuals for life in modern society. The abolition of history as a subject was driven not only by political factors but also by the large-scale reforms in the education system implemented by the Bolsheviks after their rise to power. In place of the diverse schools that existed before the revolution, the concept of a unified labor school was introduced, focused on work activity rather than the traditional memorization of educational material. In this system, classes were replaced by teams, and lessons were replaced by projects that students completed independently, using the laboratory-team method, also known as the Dalton plan. Instead of the usual division into separate subjects, instruction was organized around integrated themes, allowing for the study of a single phenomenon across multiple disciplines. The main goal of the new educational model was to provide knowledge and skills useful for further professional activity, while taking into account the interests and characteristics of children.

Reading is an important part of our lives. It not only develops our imagination and improves communication skills, but also enriches our inner world. Reading books, articles, and other materials helps broaden your horizons and improve your analytical skills. To make the most of your time reading, choose high-quality and relevant sources. This will not only enhance your knowledge but also improve your understanding of the world around you. Don't forget that regular reading promotes critical thinking and creativity.

The Bolsheviks implemented radical reforms in the education system, which led to significant changes in schools. They sought to introduce a new ideology and rethink the approach to teaching, focusing on the principles of collectivism and a scientific approach. However, over time, educational experiments began to generate fatigue and criticism. Constant changes in curricula and teaching methods led to confusion and a lack of stability. Ultimately, despite their initially ambitious goals, the Bolsheviks were faced with the need to rethink their educational strategies.

According to Lunacharsky, the main task of school was to "teach everyone to work." In the context of the young Soviet Union, the former intellectuals and writers associated with the traditional secondary school lost their relevance. This happened because a significant part of the intelligentsia showed hostility towards the Bolsheviks and their ideals. Thus, the educational system of that time had to adapt to the new realities and needs of society, forming a new generation capable of contributing to the construction of a socialist state.

What was social studies?

Until 1920, the new Soviet school, despite the proclamation of its principles, did not have educational programs. The 1918 decree "On the Unified Labor School of the Russian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic" mentioned that "model programs will be published additionally." At a meeting of the People's Commissariat of Education in February 1919, it was proposed to replace history with social science. This new subject was to cover a broad range of knowledge, including political economy, economic geography, politics, Soviet law, the history of socialism, culture, and technology, all from the perspective of dialectical materialism and Marxist political economy. Literature was also planned as an integral part of social science, with the material moving from the present to its origins, concluding with theoretical generalizations.

The introduction of integrated curricula in Soviet schools began, providing a convenient basis for replacing history with social studies. This change reflected the educational system's desire to adapt to new demands and update the content of academic subjects.

At this time, law and history-philology departments were closed at universities, considered "hotbeds of bourgeois ideology and philosophical mysticism." These departments were transformed into social science departments (FSDs), based on Marxist principles. However, some history departments continued to exist in the institutes of the Red Professors.

Reading is an important part of our lives, it not only develops mental abilities, but also enriches the inner world. Reading books helps to broaden horizons, increase the level of knowledge and improve analytical skills. Moreover, it is a great way to relax and take a break from the daily routine.

In today's world, where information is available in various formats, it is important to choose quality sources. Reading literature, scientific articles, or specialized blogs promotes critical thinking and allows you to stay up to date with the latest trends. It is also worth paying attention to fiction, which develops empathy and an understanding of human nature.

To maximize the benefit of reading, it is recommended to set aside time for regular reading, creating a comfortable atmosphere and choosing books based on your interests. This will not only enrich your inner world but also make you a more well-rounded person. Read, develop, and enjoy the process.

Institutes of Red Professors: History of Creation and Closure

Institutes of Red Professors were established in the Soviet Union in the early 1920s with the aim of training highly qualified personnel for the new socialist education system. They became an important part of the educational structure, training teachers who could incorporate Marxist-Leninist ideology into the educational process.

The creation of the Red Professorship Institutes was linked to the need to reform education after the 1917 Revolution. The transition to socialism required specialists capable not only of teaching but also of actively participating in political life. Therefore, the institutes provided students with not only theoretical knowledge but also practical skills.

Over time, with changes in the political situation and educational policy, the Red Professorship Institutes began to lose their relevance. In the late 1930s, they were closed as part of a broader campaign to reorganize the educational system. The reasons for the closure included both changes in ideology and the need to modernize approaches to teacher training.

The history of the Red Professorship Institutes illustrates the complex processes occurring in education in the Soviet Union and their influence on the formation of pedagogical thought in the country.

As a result, history virtually disappeared as an independent school subject. Social studies offered only fragmentary information, called "pictures from the past." These fragments were used to illustrate the class struggle that led to the October Revolution. Red methodologists openly stated that materials for the study of history should be selected with the aim of developing class consciousness and attitudes toward various phenomena. The main emphasis was on cultivating a passion for the struggle against exploiters and revolutionary enthusiasm in building a new society.

The main theorist and methodologist of social studies is Pokrovsky, who is repeatedly mentioned in the study. He proposed introducing an integrated approach to the teaching of political disciplines, linking them with the natural sciences. For example, the study of natural phenomena was supposed to serve as the foundation for mastering agriculture, and then move on to topics of primitive capital accumulation, exploitation, and, ultimately, to questions of imperialism and the inevitability of world revolution. Pokrovsky emphasized that all social studies teachers must adhere to communist views, which emphasized the importance of the ideological component in education.

In practice, the implementation of integrated curricula and social studies in schools encountered a number of problems. The connections between subjects in these programs often proved inconclusive. As a result, students did not properly assimilate the material, leading to poor reading and writing skills, as well as a lack of systemic knowledge. This emphasizes the need for a more in-depth analysis and revision of approaches to integrating various disciplines into the educational process.

Teachers often did not understand how to implement new teaching methods or ignored them, which hindered the adoption of the new social studies system. Not all teachers supported communist ideas, and this also influenced the perception of the educational material. In large cities like Moscow, social studies was not always given the attention it deserved, contrary to the expectations of its developers. Classes were taught in the format of regular history lessons, where social studies was perceived as a secondary element, sometimes completely overlooked due to lack of time. Teachers, lacking the skills to connect historical events with the present, often ignored the past, focusing exclusively on current issues. This created difficulties in developing students' holistic understanding of social science concepts and their significance in modern society.

Some provincial schools continued to use outdated textbooks and curricula. Political education, delivered through social studies, was often perceived as a formality that was not given due attention. This negatively impacted the educational process and the development of students' civic stance.

The difficult situation in the early years of Soviet power significantly affected the educational process. Schools lacked textbooks and desks, and students often came to class hungry. In such conditions, it was difficult to organize even traditional education, not to mention the introduction of experimental methods based on fundamentally new approaches.

Why the story was soon returned practically the same

It soon became obvious that the school's primary purpose was to provide a quality education, not to conduct social experiments. The children's lack of knowledge caused dissatisfaction among both parents and teachers. This problem did not go unnoticed by the administration of educational institutions.

Since 1925, educational institutions began to reintroduce subject-based curricula and programs, as well as the class-lesson system. In social studies, the emphasis shifted from "pictures from the past" to the study of the history of Western Europe and Russia. The subject of "literature" was gradually reinstated, and the People's Commissariat of Education began to discuss the full return of history as a separate subject. However, this did not occur according to the old programs, but with a new emphasis: the Soviet leadership began to focus on the development of "Marxist history". This task was taken on by Mikhail Pokrovsky, who proposed an approach to study and teaching oriented toward the masses.

The history we study has primarily focused on individuals: tsars, ministers, and generals. However, our task is to rethink this history and place the emphasis on the masses. Our history should reflect the experiences and achievements of the workers and peasants who form the foundation of society. It is important that we teach this history in educational institutions so that our children understand the contribution of ordinary people to the development of the country and society.

The Soviet state became increasingly centralized, and central party organs increasingly interfered with the activities of the People's Commissariat of Education. In 1927, the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) noted serious problems with the teaching of social studies in schools and instructed the People's Commissariat of Education to address them. Despite this, history remained a part of social studies courses.

The main factors that determine the weaknesses of social studies teaching include the following: insufficient practical focus of the educational process, a lack of relevant real-life examples, which hinders the understanding of theoretical concepts, and low student motivation. Furthermore, a shortage of qualified teachers and outdated teaching materials also negatively impact the quality of education. To improve the effectiveness of social studies teaching, it is necessary to update course content, integrate modern teaching methods, and actively engage students in the discussion of current social issues. The insufficient adaptation of curricula for advanced social education schools to the age-specific characteristics of students, as well as the incomplete development of programs for both concentration areas of these educational institutions, remain pressing issues. This leads to ineffectiveness of the educational process and a decline in the quality of education. It is necessary to consider the age characteristics of students when creating and implementing curricula to ensure their maximum engagement and successful assimilation of the material. The lack of social studies textbooks and workbooks adapted to school curricula and student age is a serious problem. This leads to learning difficulties and a decrease in the quality of material assimilation. Modern educational standards require educational materials that correspond to the age characteristics and educational needs of students. Without such resources, the learning process becomes less effective, which negatively impacts student preparation for exams and further education. The development and implementation of textbooks that take into account the specifics of courses and the interests of young people is necessary to ensure higher-quality education in the field of social science.

The extreme scarcity of personnel trained to teach social science in Soviet schools and the significant predominance of teachers who did not adhere to Marxist ideology had a serious impact on the quality of education. The lack of proper training for teachers in social science reduced the scientific level of instruction and hindered the development of critical thinking in students. This created barriers to the full mastery of the curriculum and an understanding of the importance of social science disciplines in the context of social development.

Insufficient work to improve the theoretical qualifications and political education of social science teachers is a serious problem. This affects the quality of education and the preparation of students for active participation in public life. Social science requires teachers not only in-depth knowledge but also the ability to convey this knowledge in an accessible form. Without regular professional development, teachers may lose the relevance of their knowledge, which affects the level of student preparation. Political education also plays a key role, as it develops students' civic stance and an understanding of the importance of participating in democratic processes. To address this issue, it is necessary to develop professional development programs that include relevant topics and methods to help social science teachers develop the necessary skills and knowledge.

The lack of systematic guidance and oversight over the teaching of social science in schools negatively impacts the quality of the educational process. Without clear methodological recommendations and regular monitoring of teaching quality, teachers may experience difficulties in implementing the curriculum. This leads to uneven levels of student knowledge and lowers the overall educational standard. It is important to implement effective monitoring and support mechanisms to ensure high-quality social science education.

The lack of alignment between the programs of the first and second concentrators of schools of social education and the admission requirements of universities creates serious problems for students. This discrepancy hinders graduates' adaptation to the high standards of higher education and reduces their competitiveness in the labor market. It is important to establish cooperation between educational institutions and universities to ensure the harmonization of curricula. This approach will create more effective conditions for the training of qualified specialists who meet current requirements.

The Resolution of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) of January 18, 1927, concerns the teaching of social studies in second-level educational institutions, factory head teachers, and among peasant youth. The document emphasizes the importance of developing students' deep knowledge of society, social structures, and the economy. Social studies should become a core subject, fostering critical thinking and social responsibility. Attention is paid to teaching methods, which must be modern and meet the needs of the times. The resolution emphasizes the need to train qualified personnel capable of consciously participating in public life and actively contributing to the country's transformation. This decision reflects the state's strategy of nurturing active citizens prepared for change and improving the social environment.

The government began to take more active steps after the economic setbacks of 1931–1932, which were the result of insufficient personnel training. In 1931, the Central Committee criticized the team-laboratory method and initiated the development of educational programs with a clearly defined set of knowledge in core subjects, such as the native language, mathematics, physics, chemistry, geography, and history. These measures were aimed at improving the quality of education and training qualified specialists, which became necessary for economic recovery and increasing the efficiency of various sectors.

This meant a return to traditional teaching methods, with education once again dominated by the attributes of the old system, such as classes, lessons, subject programs, and a strict schedule. At the same time, the labor principle in the educational process practically lost its significance. This transition to traditional forms of education negatively impacted the introduction of innovative approaches and experimentation in the educational sphere, limiting the development of critical thinking and practical skills in students.

Read also:

Pedology in Soviet schools: from innovation to pseudoscience and collapse

Pedology, as a science of child development and education, in the Soviet Union went from innovative ideas to complete collapse. In its early days, pedology attracted the attention of educators and psychologists, offering new approaches to teaching and understanding children. However, over time, some ideas and methods came to be perceived as pseudoscientific, leading to its condemnation and abandonment in educational practice.

An important aspect of pedology's development was the pursuit of a scientific basis for educational processes. Research in this field allowed for the identification of the characteristics of child psychology and the adaptation of teaching methods to the individual needs of students. However, over time, some theories became distorted and misused, contributing to the spread of pseudoscientific concepts.

Ultimately, the ideals and initial achievements of pedology were undermined by criticism and repression, leading to its complete decline. This event served as a lesson for future generations of educators and psychologists, emphasizing the importance of a scientific approach to education and the need to thoroughly test theories and methods before implementing them in practice. Following the 1931 decree, several additional directives were adopted, one of which was the joint decree of the Central Committee and the Council of People's Commissars—the Soviet government—"On the Teaching of Civil History in Schools of the USSR," dated May 15, 1934. This document condemned the replacement of history with social studies, emphasizing that students were receiving only abstract knowledge and "abstract sociological schemes" in lessons. The decree stated that history should be studied in chronological order and with a mandatory emphasis on important historical events, figures, and dates. It affirmed that only such an approach to education could ensure a correct "Marxist understanding of history." This document marked an important stage in the development of the USSR's educational policy, aimed at strengthening historical memory and an ideological foundation among young people.

The decree required the creation of new history textbooks and the restoration of history departments at the universities of Moscow and Leningrad to train specialists in the field of history. The document was signed by such statesmen as Molotov and Stalin. This action emphasized the importance of historical education and the need to develop qualified historians for future research and teaching.

The content of the new history curricula emphasizes individuals, particularly revolutionaries and their leaders. These figures become the center of study, as their activities fit well with the theory of social formations and class struggle. The most important figure, occupying a key place in the historical narrative, remains Joseph Stalin, known as the "Father of Nations."

The situation in the country and the world was undergoing significant changes. The global revolution faded into the background, and the USSR focused on building socialism within a single country. As a new bloody world war, a clash of ideologies, approached, figures from the past—commanders and rulers—began to return to history textbooks. History became a tool for cultivating the willpower necessary for Soviet citizens in a complex international environment, which ultimately contributed to the development of patriotism. At Politburo meetings, Soviet leaders emphasized that history must regain its state-oriented, patriotic character, traditional to pre-revolutionary schools. Thus, history in the USSR returned to the approaches that the Bolsheviks had initially actively opposed. Primary sources of information play a key role in the formation of knowledge and decision-making. They can include scientific research, statistics, expert opinions, and official reports. High-quality sources ensure the reliability and relevance of information, which is especially important in a rapidly changing world. Using a variety of sources allows for a more complete understanding of the subject and avoids bias and distortions. When selecting sources, it is important to consider their authority, integrity, and independence to ensure the information is reliable and useful.

Balashov E. M. Policy in the Field of School, Vocational and Secondary Specialized Education, 1917–1941 // Schedule of Changes. Essays on the History of Educational and Scientific Policy in the Russian Empire — USSR (late 1880s — 1930s). — Moscow, 2012.
Berlyavsky L. G. The Role and Functions of the People's Commissariat of Education // Schedule of Changes. Essays on the History of Educational and Scientific Policy in the Russian Empire — USSR (late 1880s — 1930s). — Moscow, 2012.
Bogachev A. V., Zakharova L. B. The Concept of Development of the Public Education System in Soviet Russia in the 1920s // Bulletin of the Samara State Technical University. Series: Psychological and pedagogical sciences.
Boguslavsky M. V. Development and implementation of variable strategies for modernization of the Soviet education system (1917-1930) // Problems of modern education.
Vitevitsky V. P., Lavrenov S. Ya. History as a subject in Russian schools. Part 2. Historical education in the USSR // Scientific and analytical journal "Obozrevatel" - Observer.
Dubrovsky A. M. From the problems of historical education to the new image of historical science // Historian and power. Bryansk, 2005.
Ivanov K. V. New education policy in 1917-1922. Higher education reform // Schedule of changes: Essays on the history of educational and scientific policy in the Russian Empire - USSR (late 1880s - 1930s). M., 2012.
Lunacharsky A. V. On the teaching of history in a communist school. Petrograd, 1918.
Milovanov K. Yu. Strategies and priorities for the development of state educational policy (1917-1930) // Problems of modern education.
Pomelov V. B. Program and methodological work of the People's Commissariat of Education of the RSFSR in the first years of Soviet power // Bulletin of Vyatka State University.
Khoroshenkova A. V. Higher education in the life of Soviet society in the 1930s (based on materials from the Lower Volga region) // Sociosciences.
Shchulepnikova E. I. Why history was not taught in schools in the 1920s // Teaching history in school.

Find out more

How history lessons were removed from Soviet schools for 14 years

Contents:

Why History Disappeared

What was social studies?

Why the story was soon returned practically the same